Das James Bond 007 Forum

Maibaum hat geschrieben:Daniel meinte es umgekehrt. DAD hätte abschauen sollen, nicht bei DAd abschauen.

Let's see, where to begin?
Aside from the fact that you have openly illegally infringed on a copyrighted intellectual property franchise, including the music, I did get some good laughs from it this morning.

I especially liked the part where "Bond," (Lame Bond) pulls out an aerosol canister and proceeds to lay down a line of high explosive foam to blow open a very flimsy door that could have been easily opened with a paper clip or a good swift kick. The "explosion" effect was a joke.

I also could not understand why agent 006.91 had no trouble killing several guards in cold blood, and then lets the wussy looking "scientist" standing by the hot water heater live? And then attempts to blow the tank with a smoke detector. How big were the friggin pockets on that wet suit anyway?

Speaking of the wet suit. Bond (dumb Bond) went into the water without flippers (basic tool), but yet his wet suit was fully armed arrayed with all kinds of other high-tech wardrobe functions. "Q" should be taken out and shot along with the continuity girl.

The acting and the plot line were extremely juvenile and the only good thing I have to say is that some of the cinematography looked great, especially in the opening scenes, but quickly went down hill. Disappointing.

But I will give you and your young crew an "A" for effort in your hard work of play acting. I did enjoy watching it, but declined to click on "Part 2." I simply lost interest by that point